Search for: "State v. Pinch"
Results 41 - 60
of 180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 1:46 pm
Based on current schedules, there will be two Apple v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 3:08 pm
In the case of People v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Bixler v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 8:26 am
At the Apple v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 1:23 pm
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:49 pm
It led to a strong judicial slapdown of the Department of Justice by one of our nation's leading jurists, in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:12 pm
District Court, District of Arizona (Phoenix); appellate case, Cervantes v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
It was just probabilistic.Apple's July 2011 assertion of the '129 patent against HTC in Delaware never came to judgment because the parties settled before anything significant happened in court.Other reexaminations and reexamination requests involving Apple patents-in-suitThese two patents are just the latest Apple patents to have given rise to reexamination requests:In late July 2013 the USPTO issued a final (but not really final) rejection of all claims of Apple's pinch-to-zoom API patent… [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
R (RJM) (FC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63 This House of Lords judgment is now just under two weeks old, but I think it is still worthy of comment here. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
After a barbiturate is administered to render the inmate unconscious, a guard is to speak the prisoner's name, brush a finger over the prisoner's eyelashes and pinch his arm. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:17 pm
The next Apple v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 7:55 am
As the oldest English proverb still widely used today states: You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:34 pm
On Thursday evening local time, Judge Lucy Koh, the federal judge presiding over two Apple v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm
It's misleading to say that the USPTO "has [...] deemed [the '915 pinch-to-zoom API patent] invalid" because the USPTO proceedings are still ongoing and could still be ongoing for a couple of years. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm
And one month later, a cert petition was filed in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 1:03 pm
“And so what’s this court supposed to do, a pinch of this, a pinch of that? [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 8:20 am
Belden Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:35 pm
In Apple v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
’” (Catholic Charities of Sacramento, 32 Cal. 4th 527, 565 (2004), quoting United States v. [read post]
