Search for: "State v. Planned Parenthood of Kansas"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Akron Center for Reproductive Health and Planned Parenthood of Kansas City v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Akron Center for Reproductive Health and Planned Parenthood of Kansas City v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
But because one lived in Kansas City, Kansas, and the other lived in Kansas City, Missouri (how does that city work again?) [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
A California District Court prohibited the Center for Medical Progress going public with a video of Planned Parenthood folks talking. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am
Our new favorite acronym, NHRtL, looks to have picked up a third relist in its attempt to obtain documents regarding a grant to Planned Parenthood from the Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:26 am
State law provides a non-exclusive list of eight factors for courts to consider when deciding whether a parenting plan is in a child’s best interests. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
In Hurst v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
Kansas, 18-6135 Issue: Whether the Eighth and 14th Amendments permit a state to abolish the insanity defense. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Kansas, 18-6135 Issue: Whether the Eighth and 14th Amendments permit a state to abolish the insanity defense. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-8 Issues: (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Kansas Gov. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-6540, Orr v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Fourth, United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
(in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-1356 Case name: Kansas v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Abortion Planned Parenthood Ass’n of Utah v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:14 pm
Beyond his opinions, the Justice’s vote has often been essential, as when he played a central role in the troika in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
