Search for: "State v. Planned Parenthood of Kansas" Results 41 - 60 of 64
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340, and Gee v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 8:25 am by Manny Marotta
Attorneys for Planned Parenthood had argued that Missouri’s laws were “virtually identical” [Kansas City Star report] to the Texas law declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 2016 in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:46 pm by Aurora Barnes
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act which require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
A California District Court prohibited the Center for Medical Progress going public with a video of Planned Parenthood folks talking. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Abortion Planned Parenthood Ass’n of Utah v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
But because one lived in Kansas City, Kansas, and the other lived in Kansas City, Missouri (how does that city work again?) [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
Wholly apart from the fact that the acronym for the petitioner’s name sounds eerily like the single worst cartoon character of all time, that four-time relist concerns a FOIA request for records related to a government grant to Planned Parenthood. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am by John Elwood
Our new favorite acronym, NHRtL, looks to have picked up a third relist in its attempt to obtain documents regarding a grant to Planned Parenthood from the Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 10:23 am by Bill
Planned Parenthood looks to me like the same sort of bad faith, but legislative competence and good faith must be presumed. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:06 pm
Wade in the later case of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:11 am by Eugene Volokh
If so, then governmental attempts to pressure manufacturers into not selling such guns to the public would likely themselves be unconstitutional conditions, unless manufacturers could still sell the guns through affiliate corporations, see Planned Parenthood of Mid-Missouri & Eastern Kansas, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:13 pm
Further, this exception does not resolve the central issue that this bill unconstitutionally places limits on abortion in the same way that the United States Supreme Court struck down such limits in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Lovechilde
Nobody is doing more than Planned Parenthood to reduce unintended pregnancy. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 2:03 pm by Lovechilde
– Attack On Planned Parenthood: While simultaneously trying to ban abortions outright, GOP lawmakers on a state and federal level launched a full-scale effort to defund Planned Parenthood. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:03 pm by Bridget Crawford
Ruthann Robson blogs over (here) at Constitutional Law Profs about the decision in Planned Parenthood of Kansas v. [read post]