Search for: "State v. Pohle"
Results 41 - 60
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2016, 4:20 pm
Connell has essentially two legal arguments for why Judge Pohl is emp [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 6:55 am
For the United States, Clay Trivett, Robert Swann, Edward Ryan and Major Christopher of the U.S. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:29 pm
Rushforth then turns to Judge Waits’ relationship with Fred Taylor, who was previously part of the United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 3:09 pm
With this, Judge Pohl calls time and orders a recess. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
General Martins begins by calling Judge Pohl’s attention to the ‘ten-category framework’ from his 2014 discovery order in United States v. al Nashiri. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 5:54 am
The former Secretary of State and presidential candidate outlined her national security plan against the Islamic State in a speech at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm
” He also stated that Turkish forces were in Iraq to train and equip forces fighting the Islamic State and that Turkish presence in the country was no secret. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:28 am
Citing a DC Circuit case United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 8:20 pm
The main case she cited was United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:48 am
Nevin, the SJA explained that KSM’s stated reason for not attending was that the guard force had not told him that there was a hearing scheduled for Sunday. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:34 pm
Judge Pohl interjects to state the obvious and uneasy conclusion of this argument is that a pro se defendant must have access to classified information. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 7:44 am
For the first time since February, proceedings in military commissions case United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 9:35 am
In weighing recently a request for modification in Pohl v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am
Douglas Smith looks at Evenwel v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 8:11 pm
Pohl, B.J. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
After the ups and downs of this week’s hearings in the military commissions case of United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:26 am
Pohl, IPRax 2013, 110; Hartley, ICLQ 2014, 861). [read post]