Search for: "State v. Pound"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
The publishers will pay all of Prince Harry’s legal costs, plus around £300,000 extra in damages. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
The total costs sought are just under £2 million. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am
The claimant, Dr Wright, was found, at first instance, to have put forward a “deliberately false” case in relation to suffering serious harm to his reputation and Chamberlain J awarded nominal damages of £1. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual… [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
For instance, counsel for South Africa dwelt at length on Israel’s dropping of hundreds of 2,000-pound bombs in Gaza, alleging that such a practice was among the ways that it committed genocide there. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:29 am
Pound sand. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
This technicality has led to cases as absurd-sounding as United States of America v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
Despite the deep fakes breaching Facebook’s policies, more than £12,900 was spent by actors originating from 23 countries to promote the videos. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am
The Defendants were ordered to pay Packham £90,000 in damages. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
United States Trustee v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am
Simon Hoare, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (and, we learned, the Government’s Minister for Faith), replied. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
—Herb Denenberg, former Commissioner of Insurance for Pennsylvania 1Jarrett v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Carly Forrest et al, Lexology: Vicarious Liability in Scotland – the retreat continues: on the recent Inner House judgment in C & S v Shaw and Live Active Leisure [2023] CSIH 36. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 2:57 pm
Some background for the motion to keep defendant in jail pending trial (U.S. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
State Department, Matthew Miller, said today. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in R (CAAT) v Secretary of State for International Trade [2019] EWCA Civ 1020 provides useful insight into how well-established principles of “irrationality” apply in the international arms trade context, and the extent to which the latitude afforded to the executive in this policy area affects this process. [read post]
