Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 41 - 60
of 13,579
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 6:30 am
Justices Leave Door Open to Discovery Rule Copyright Damages — Bloomberg Law’s Kyle Jahner writes about yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Warner Chappell Music v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:29 am
Federal Trade Commission, 3:24-cv-986, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, filed April 23, 2024; Chamber of Commerce for the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:36 am
As stated, the Plaintiff in Tarkenton alleges that she registered her cell phone number on the National Do Not Call registry on February 9, 2009. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am
Facts The underlying case is based on the following facts: a Romanian citizen was registered as female at birth in Romania. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
By the early 1990s, digital registries such as the Art Loss Register (ALR) and commissions like the Commission for Art Recovery were established worldwide, specifically focusing on the identification of stolen artworks. [read post]
5 May 2024, 7:44 pm
Supreme Court’s 1884 opinion in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Company v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 10:26 am
The briefing cites to Naterra International, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 8:31 pm
Seilkop v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:25 pm
See page 107 of FDA’s 1st Quarter FY2024 MDUVA V Report (here). [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:55 am
Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 2:07 pm
” In reaching this conclusion, the Copyright Office relies on the case of Naruto v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:00 am
Despite its length, the Guidance conspicuously omits any reference to last fall’s landmark decision in FTC v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:00 am
The Copyright Office has determined that copyright in AI-generated work can only be registered if there is a sufficient level of human involvement, although the specific level of involvement remains unclear [see Thaler v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am
This should also act as a warning to those who might be contemplating registering a mark which is similar to a well-known historic mark, which might still have a reputation even if it has not been in use for a couple of years. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:11 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
He ran the journal out of his office, and the journal’s domain was registered in his name. [read post]