Search for: "State v. Ripa"
Results 41 - 60
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm
A number of police officers were cross-examined at a public hearing before the Tribunal about the decision to access journalists records using RIPA, rather than the Police and Criminal Evidence Act. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:10 pm
Journalists must be able to perform their work without fear of intimidation or censure by the state. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
Palmer used twitter to announce his plan to sue after the state election. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
RIPA, DRIPA and the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 9:03 am
The pending appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am
”John Thorpe MP put the State firmly ahead of the individual:“… In my view the State is in great danger, and no power which would tend to protect it should be withheld from the Government. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am
If that were the case we would not have had decisions such as S & Marper v UK – which declared unlawful the indefinite retention of DNA samples by police of individuals who had not been convicted of any offences. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am
If that were the case we would not have had decisions such as S & Marper v UK – which declared unlawful the indefinite retention of DNA samples by police of individuals who had not been convicted of any offences. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 2:00 pm
The Secretary of State has discretion to insist on the limits being adhered to but need not. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:56 am
This catch-all phrase did not hold the field for long though and less than a decade later, eleven judges in of that Court in State of Bombay v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
The division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 differed from the device of I2 […] in that it included the (additional and final) feature dealing with the relationship between the light output L and the signal level V. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:06 am
The Bar Council wrote to the Home Secretary to urge the Government to consider seriously whether RIPA operates consistently in the public interest. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm
The IPT hears ECHR and HRA based claims against the conduct of public authoriie with RIPA powers. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
The result was RIPA. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:36 am
The result was RIPA. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:10 am
However the CPS guidance quotes "DPP v McKeown, DPP v Jones ([1997] 2Cr App R, 155, HL at page 163) [where] Lord Hoffman defined a computer as "a device for storing, processing and retrieving information". [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 4:44 am
You stated that the newspaper had paid police officers for information. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am
It is right to state that some 18 months later, as part of an examination of material in the New York Times, the CPS signalled an intention hereon to take a broader view of the relevant legislation. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:15 am
” Ripa v. [read post]
