Search for: "State v. S. D. M."
Results 41 - 60
of 9,608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2024, 6:00 am
ENTER: Darrell M. [read post]
26 May 2024, 7:49 pm
(on the applicable rules in the MENA Arab jurisdictions including Bahrain, see Béligh Elbalti, “Perspectives from the Arab World”, in M. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
In the Court’s upcoming decisions in SEC v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:13 am
Facebook, 2024 WL 2260363 (D. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
Decided on May 15, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentCOLLEEN D. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
Decided on May 15, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentCOLLEEN D. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:05 pm
Judge Milan D. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
In the Court’s upcoming decisions in SEC v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am
District Court for the District of New Jersey‘s 1989 decision in Cammer v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
Following 9/11, I never thought I'd hear chants of or see signs with "death to America" at scale in our own country. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been… [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding mechanism in its 7-2 decision in CFPB v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Defendants nonetheless failed to meet their burden of showing that they lacked "constructive notice of the condition and a reasonable time to correct or warn about its existence" (Parietti v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 29 NY3d 1136, 1137 [2017]).On the issue of constructive notice, defendants relied on the testimony of the school's custodian engineer, who stated that she "usually" conducted daily inspections of the building's doors, during… [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Defendants nonetheless failed to meet their burden of showing that they lacked "constructive notice of the condition and a reasonable time to correct or warn about its existence" (Parietti v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 29 NY3d 1136, 1137 [2017]).On the issue of constructive notice, defendants relied on the testimony of the school's custodian engineer, who stated that she "usually" conducted daily inspections of the building's doors, during… [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]