Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 41 - 60 of 71,935
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Berke Gursoy
This is a high but not impossible bar to meet, as shown in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:43 am by Rose Hughes
Notably, § 112, r 6 does not state that the Specification must also describe equivalents of that structure. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by Jennifer L. Selin
Put in terms underlying the Supreme Court’s famous decision in Marbury v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
It’s easy to dismiss complaints about a pro-contact culture by saying ‘well, it’s just the law’. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Here, plaintiff fails to plead facts stating a claim for both “fraud on the court” and under Judiciary Law§ 487. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:30 am by Jon Choi
Brooks and Gamage’s work is especially timely given that the Supreme Court will rule on Moore v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am by Michael Oykhman
Voyeurism is covered under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada (the “Code”). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
  On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by Michael Oykhman
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]