Search for: "State v. Schauer" Results 41 - 60 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Nowhere is this phenomenon more evident than in the Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Assoc., Ltd., 266 AD2d 125, 125 [1st Dept 1999]; see also Schauer v Joyce, 54 NY2d 1, 6 [1981] [holding that allegation that another attorney “contributed to or aggravated [plaintiffs] injuries” sufficiently stated contribution claim]. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
LaMarca, prior to his retirement from the bench, denied the motion to dismiss, relying on Schauer v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 1:30 pm by Guest Blogger
As evidence of this trend, consider the Court’s decision in American Legion v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:38 pm by Michael C. Dorf
We wrote a brief together in Elane Photography v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:48 am by Jon
Massanari, 266 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2001), citing Anastasoff v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm by Morgan Weiland
. ______________, The First Amendment and the Ideal of Civic Courage: The Brandeis Opinion in Whitney v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:20 am
Therefore, it is an abuse of discretion to rely on scoring models to determine a sentence.Rhodes v State, 896 NE2d 1193 (Ind App 2008). [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:44 am by Jon
 [41] Frederick Schauer, Precedent, 39 Stan. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
    Could be part of the vast universe of communication that isn’t protected speech: Fred Schauer’s writing. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The eponymous ‘collapse’ of remedies against illegal state violence bubbles up from the larger ‘collapse’ of these “unspoken presuppositions” (in Fred Schauer’s felicitous words) of Article III. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, which reawakened Commerce Clause review of federal legislation yet hardly ushered in a new era of robust judicial review; and District of Columbia v. [read post]