Search for: "State v. Schlesinger " Results 41 - 60 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d 610, 615 (1st Dept. 2015) (internal citation omitted). [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:49 am
” This reflected the legislature's intent that the FAL should provide extraterritorial protection from false claims made in California, the court noted.The opinion in Schlesinger v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:39 am by Katharine Lammiman
In June 2012, two journalists from The Times, Mr Alexi Mostrous and Ms Fay Schlesinger approached HMRC for an ‘off the record’ discussion about tax avoidance to inform their background investigations for a proposed article. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:50 am by Philip Segal
The nightmare scenario is the famed Winnie the Pooh case in California, Stephen Schlesinger, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am by Dan Tench
In June 2012, two journalists from The Times, Mr Alexi Mostrous and Ms Fay Schlesinger, approached HMRC for an “off the record” discussion relating to tax avoidance to inform their background investigations for a proposed article. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 4:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Plaintiff could not have prevailed in the underlying action — and, therefore, cannot prevail in this legal malpractice action (see Warshaw Burnstein Cohen Schlesinger & Kuh, LLP v Longmire, 106 AD3d 536, 536 [1st Dept 2013]) — because plaintiff’s fraud and breach of contract claims against Stack’s and the auctioneers would have been flatly defeated by the various disclaimers and conditions in the terms of sale contained in the auction… [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:27 pm
Schilder, 340 U.S. 128 (1950), and Schlesinger v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Because classifications based upon gender are frequently based upon dated and "overbroad generalizations as in Schlesinger v. [read post]