Search for: "State v. Shelby"
Results 41 - 60
of 724
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2017, 12:36 pm
Herbert, United States District Judge for Utah, Judge Robert J. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm
Think of United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:29 am
Supreme Court’s Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:34 am
Sam Levine and Kira Lerner for The Guardian: In 2013, the US supreme court gutted the pre-clearance requirement in a landmark case called Shelby county v Holder. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 11:17 am
Kathy Joan Copas v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:22 am
This was the first Presidential election since the Supreme Court’s notorious Shelby County v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 5:18 pm
MONICA WHITMORE v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Recent coverage of, and commentary on, the Court focused on last week’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 10:52 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:51 am
Holder, and the two same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 9:58 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:05 pm
Stay tuned over the next year as we share more stories about the current state of indigent defense, fifty years after Gideon v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:23 pm
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 16-833 Issues: (1) Whether a federal court has the authority to re-impose, under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the same “anti-retrogression” preclearance standard invalidated as to Section 5 by Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:35 pm
The US Supreme Court has set February 27 for oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:07 am
Joby Lee Teal v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:25 pm
Here is his abstract: The plaintiffs in Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 4:25 pm
Doe v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm
For the last twenty-five years, the Court, in a number of landmark cases, has restored the equal sovereignty of the states (Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:52 am
Shelby L. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]