Search for: "State v. Speciale" Results 41 - 60 of 26,362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2011, 2:05 am by sally
LO (Jordan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 164; [2011] WLR (D) 68 “The Court of Appeal had jurisdiction to hear a further appeal from the Special Immigration Appeals Commission only when there had been a final determination of the appeal to the commission and it had issued a decision as to the disposition. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 8:15 am by Diana Skaggs
To obtain special immigration status, the immigrant child must present findings to a state juvenile court that satisfy certain criteria. [read post]
9 May 2015, 7:39 am by Walter Olson
And for everyone who, like me, has been noticing the parallels between bad cop entrenchment and teacher tenure, Charles Lane wants to call our attention to the pending Supreme Court case of Friedrichs v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 2:12 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “When a person appealed against an order for deportation because he feared torture or ill-treatment in his home state, in scrutinising the case, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission was entitled to take into account closed as well as open material. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:38 am
The net effect of the court advising the jury that the State had no obligation to produce evidence, which was indisputably available to it, either explicitly or implicitly relieved the State, in the minds of the jurors, of the burden to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 1:04 am
The State should have affirmatively advised the trial court that such report either did or did not exist or, if the State was likewise uncertain, ought to have sought from the court the opportunity to clarify whether such report was made. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:19 am
The Appellant argued, with agreement from the State, that at no time prior to the trial date or on the trial date did a circuit court judge provide the advice required by Rule 4-215(a) (1)-(5), which reads in part:Rule 4-215. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 5:09 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the petition: US v Bryant Cert Petition Question presented: Section 117(a) of Title 18, United States Code, makes it a federal crime for any person to “commit[] a domestic assault within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States or Indian country” if the person “has a final conviction on at least 2 separate prior occasions in Federal, State, or Indian tribal court proceedings for” enumerated… [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:44 am
It does not require an intent beyond that just stated. [read post]