Search for: "State v. Spiegel"
Results 41 - 60
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2010, 7:49 am
In Donohue v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:18 am
(See, e.g., Wilkinson v Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 920 F2d 1560 [11th Cir 1991]; Hill v Spiegel, Inc., 708 F2d 233, 237 [6th Cir 1983]). [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 3:29 am
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, a complaint must allege the negligence of the attorney, that the negligence was a proximate cause of the loss sustained, and actual damages (Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 267 [2006], affd 9 NY3d 836 [2007]). [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:29 am
The plaintiff in Reese v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am
Spiegel v Rowland, 552 US 1257; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302; Gioeli v Vlachos, 89 AD3d 984; Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d 169, 176). [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 4:39 am
The failure to demonstrate proximate cause requires dismissal of a legal malpractice action regardless of whether the attorney was negligent (see Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 267-268 [2006], affd 9 NY3d 836 [2007])" (id. at 797). [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:23 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 3:25 pm
Issues under consideration include whether the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights can be relied upon to justify exceptions or limitations beyond those in the Copyright Directive (Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck, C-516/17; Funke Medien (Case C-469/17) (Advocate General Opinion 25 October 2018 here) and PelhamCase 476/17); and whether a link to a PDF amounts to publication for the purposes of the quotation exception (Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck,… [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:26 pm
Finally, there is an extended reflection on the Advocate General's conclusions on the Spiegel Online case relating to copyright exceptions and their interaction with fundamental rights. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 4:31 am
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must plead “the negligence of the attorney; that the negligence was the proximate cause of the loss sustained; and actual damages” (Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 267 [1st Dept 2006], a.ffd 9 NY3d 836 [2007], cert denied, 552 US 1257 [2008] [citations omitted]). [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:15 pm
Arthur Spiegel***Ivonne Cuesta v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:56 am
Blankfein et al. and Spiegel v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 6:49 am
In its June 9, 2022 decision in Spiegel v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:05 am
V. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:47 am
” (Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836, 837 [2007] [internal citations omitted].) [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
*** * In its Stewart decision, the Appellate Division states "Consistent with its statutory purpose, the Sheriff's resort to Civil Service Law §71 was presumably “to secure a steady, reliable, and adequate work force,” (Matter of Duncan v New York State Dev. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
(see e.g., Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836; Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008; Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169). [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
See Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 268 (I st Dept 2006) (“The failure to demonstrate proximate cause mandates the dismissal of a legal malpractice action regardless of whether the attorney was negligent. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:34 am
(Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d at 268.) [read post]
