Search for: "State v. Standard"
Results 41 - 60
of 50,560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2009, 1:55 am
Regina (Bary) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Al Fawwaz) v Same Queen's Bench Divisional Court “There was no common standard for what did or did not amount to inhuman or degrading treatment throughout the many different countries in the world. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
State v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 6:17 am
The standard was discussed further in State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:25 am
While Dowl argued for de novo review under United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
In its review, the Supreme Court of New Jersey Court adopted the Luttenberger standard, which requires a defendant to describe with reasonable particularity the information sought in discovery. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 2:28 pm
North Carolina now challenges the Withdrawal Rule as contrary to EPA policy requiring states’ adherence to NOx emissions budgets based on the one-hour ozone standard after the repeal of the one-hour standard, as nonconformance with the mandate in Michigan v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 9:49 pm
District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
By the Kean Miller State and Local Tax Team On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:51 am
On January 7, 2012, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:51 am
On January 7, 2012, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 8:25 am
” Khoury v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
Under the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court yesterday heard oral argument in The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 2:36 pm
United States and Skilling v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:46 am
By Stevie PhillipsIn a unanimous Tennessee Supreme Court opinion handed down on September 26, Chief Justice Wade outlines the historical development of state and federal sentencing guidelines.In short, he observes that the 2005 amendments to Tennessee's 1989 Sentencing Act were passed for the purpose of bringing our sentencing scheme in line with United States Supreme Court sentencing decisions, namely Apprendi and its progeny. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 4:54 pm
United States, the important 2000 decision in which a divided United States Supreme Court held that the standard established in Miranda v. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 6:52 am
Brown-Hunter v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
Joyce v Secretary of State for Health Queen’s Bench Division “Where a care worker challenged a finding of misconduct which had resulted in her being placed by the Secretary of State for Health on a list of those considered unsuitable to work with vulnerable adults, the Care Standards Tribunal was entitled, on appeal, to consider allegations of misconduct not entertained by the secretary of state, provided it acted fairly. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:59 am
By Ashley PaynterIn Bonner v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 11:21 am
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, the discussion seemingly centered around dry procedural minutiae and one of the banes of legal writing courses—the appropriate standard of review to... [read post]
