Search for: "State v. Sussex" Results 41 - 60 of 239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 1 May 2020, Warby J handed down judgment in the Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers [2020] EWHC 1058 (Ch). [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 9:00 pm by Karen Tani
Deborah Kang (California State University San Marcos) on her book The INS on the Line: Making Immigration Law on the US-Mexico Border, 1917-1954 (Oxford University Press in 2017); Mary Anne Franks (University of Miami School of Law) on The Cult of the Constitution (Stanford University Press, 2019; and James Gordon Finlayson (University of Sussex) on The Habermas-Rawls Debate (Columbia University Press, 2019). [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
India Kerala has become the first state in India to distribute drone surveillance systems to all of its policing districts. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:40 am by tracey
Supreme Court Gnango, R. v [2011] UKSC 59 (14 December 2011) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor [2011] UKSC 60 (14 December 2011) Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2011] UKSC 58 (14 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Revenue And Customs v Lansdowne Partners Ltd Partnership [2011] EWCA Civ 1578 (20 December 2011) Ablyazov & Ors v JSC BTA Bank [2011] EWCA Civ 1588 (20 December… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am by INFORRM
United States Talks of a federal privacy law continue in the United States, the New York Times reports. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 7:30 am by JONATHAN DAVIES AND ELLIOT GOLD
When a judicial review was brought against the decision of a misconduct hearing panel, the defendant was the chief constable of that force: see R (Gannon) v Chief Constable of Merseyside [2009] EWHC 2133 (Admin) and R (Evans) v Chief Constable of Sussex [2011] EWHC 2329 (not available on Bailii or ICLR). [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have announced their intention to launch legal action against the Mail on Sunday for publishing a private handwritten letter the Duchess had sent to her estranged father. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:55 pm
" Associated Newspapers have stated that they "categorically deny that the duchess's letter was edited in any way that changed its meaning. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The claimants, who include the Duke of Sussex, Guy Ritchie, Hugh Grant and Doreen Lawrence, sought to add further evidence to their claim, including 235 stories which appeared in the Sun and News of the World between 1994 and 2016. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:18 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Davis v R [2010] EWCA Crim 708 (31 March 2010) Greaves & Ors v R [2010] EWCA Crim 709 (31 March 2010) Delucca, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 710 (31 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Valentines Homes & Construction Ltd, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 345 (31 March 2010) Servier Laboratories Ltd v National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence & Anor [2010] EWCA… [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Thus far, the press has successfully argued that anything more than self-regulation would reduce them to Pravda-esque publications, doing the bidding of the Nanny state Government that would otherwise regulate them. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:39 pm by Simon Gibbs
” Again, in Dudley Fleming v Chief Constable of Sussex [2004] EWCA Civ 643, Potter LJ observed at paragraph 36: “The principles are too well known to require to be set out in detail. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
In our blog In defence of privacy and the judiciary we discussed how the press had misreported the decision in HRH the Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 1810 and, with the assistance of the government, had weaponised that misreporting to lobby for the reform of privacy law. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The Duchess of Sussex has won the latest round of her privacy and copyright claim against the Mail on Sunday, with a unanimous judgment of the Court of Appeal upholding the decision of the High Court ([2021] EWCA Civ 1810). [read post]