Search for: "State v. TM"
Results 41 - 60
of 740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2006, 6:32 am
TMs are communicative goods. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 7:38 am
Naked TM (Fed. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:27 pm
A reader posted the following comment to yesterday’s post about the CreAgri v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Old UK case, Hermes TM: take into account whether the TM has been abandoned. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 12:09 pm
PC Drivers Headquarters, LP v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:10 am
In class 43, the following three trade marks were the first ones filed by Hunan Chayue: The verbal elements of the three respective trade marks (‘TM Bs’) all have only one character that differs from the TM A:TM A: ‘茶 (tea) 颜 (face) 观 (observe) 色 (colour)’ v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 2:00 pm
King v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:50 am
Galloway decision and the "geography of church and state" (TM), I wrote to express my hope that Rich Schragger of UVa would say something about these issues. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
YSL v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 8:50 am
Lontex Corp. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 5:54 am
Audi AG v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:02 am
Pennsylvania State Univ. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
Dupart v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 5:25 am
Spire, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:20 am
Kenyon v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 8:38 am
Honeywell International Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 1:45 pm
Desmond v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
Tasting the TM in Pepsi/Coke studies.What we know about brands v. what we know about TMs—Deven Desai has written about the distinction and the lack thereof that has been part of the problem. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:24 am
Multifab, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am
The CJEU stated that to do so would be to prevent the earlier TM being relied on to oppose later TM applications, effectively saying that the earlier TM has no distinctive character, which cannot be possible as the ear [read post]
