Search for: "State v. Tardie"
Results 41 - 60
of 306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2021, 11:09 pm
Terry v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 9:00 am
Stores v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 pm
The PTO declined to consider Exela’s petition, stating that no law or regulation authorizes non-party challenge to a PTO ruling to accept a tardy filing. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:19 pm
Chronic health problems may not constitute a disability within the meaning of ADA or the State’s Human Rights LawSirota v NYC Bd. of Ed., App. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:11 am
In Denmark v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:11 am
In Denmark v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 8:24 am
In Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:00 am
S.A.M.D. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:00 am
S.A.M.D. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
See Chuang [v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:19 am
We're making an exception for today's decision in Gazal v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:54 am
The case is entitled Thompson v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 12:16 pm
" Noting that the Employer's determination was supported by documentary evidence of Petitioner's misconduct and history of tardiness, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Adelana v New York City Dept. of Educ., 194 AD3d 463, said that there was nothing in the record to support Petitioner's argument that the Employer made its determination in bad faith. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 12:16 pm
" Noting that the Employer's determination was supported by documentary evidence of Petitioner's misconduct and history of tardiness, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Adelana v New York City Dept. of Educ., 194 AD3d 463, said that there was nothing in the record to support Petitioner's argument that the Employer made its determination in bad faith. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 11:13 am
Cheung v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 11:13 am
Cheung v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:04 pm
From Judge Stephen Clark's opinion in Steak N Shake, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 11:33 am
Employers Relied on Dobin v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 9:25 am
The style of the case is, Higginbotham v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
Circuit turned to this question, in the case of Hentif v. [read post]
