Search for: "State v. Tillman" Results 41 - 60 of 298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am by Norman L. Eisen
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 3:46 am by SHG
” Part V will respond to recent academic arguments suggesting that the President is an “officer of the United States” for purposes of Section 3. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
  They made no distinction between an officer, which included the president, an officer of the United States, and an officer under the United States. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
United States could signal a retreat from the Court's willingness--in Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Nor does the “engage” prong extend to inaction—for example, failing to take action with regard to an insurrection or rebellion.Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm by Josh Blackman
Calabresi now agrees with Tillman that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm by Josh Blackman
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm by Josh Blackman
I have now had a chance to read the entire 45-page indictment in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Section V reviews an anti-bribery statute enacted by the first Congress. [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Section V analyzes the Oath or Affirmation Clause, which suggests that Senators and Representatives, as well as the President, are not “Officers of the United States. [read post]