Search for: "State v. Toy" Results 41 - 60 of 1,039
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am by Hannah R. Albion
As Justice Kagan stated: “This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two words seldom appearing in the same sentence. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
VIP Products LLC, a dispute involving a “Bad Spaniels” dog toy parody of Jack Daniel’s brand of whisky. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
In a case involving a whiskey bottle dog toy with important findings for retailers and brand protection, the Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s rulings on trademark infringement and trademark dilution in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by Devin Ricci
Images from Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.On June 8, 2023, the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Jack Daniels in the case of Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Mark Walsh
Board of Education, the landmark civil rights case out of that state. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 8:22 am by Hannah R. Albion
Creative expression through the sale of parody-based dog toys has recently caught the attention of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:26 am by Benjamin Goh
In C-427/15 New Wave/All Toys, it held that a request for information could be made after infringement proceedings had concluded. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am by Scott Bomboy
The Court is considering if the trademark holder is protected by the Lanham Act or if the toys’ producer instead receives heightened First Amendment protection due to the humorous nature of the dog toys, among other factors.Merrill v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:20 pm by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]