Search for: "State v. Waffle"
Results 41 - 60
of 141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2014, 10:58 am
Waffle House is not inconsistent with such a rule. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:49 pm
Waffle House, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 3:59 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 3:59 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
’s Office v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:51 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 7:32 am
Stewart v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 10:09 pm
The case cite is Sur La Table, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The Court then summarized the case law regarding the required proof:In addition, according to case-law, although it must be proved that a mark has acquired distinctive character through use throughout the European Union, the same types of evidence do not have to be provided in respect of each Member State (...).Furthermore, the Court has repeatedly held that there was insufficient proof of distinctive character acquired through use of a mark throughout the European Union where evidence was… [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 7:06 pm
People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:16 am
Shaw, a veteran with mental health issues, was at a Waffle House with his wife and sister. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:59 pm
Waffle House, Inc., appears at CCH Business Franchise Guide ¶14,695. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:30 pm
I'm just saying.]PD-1097-08, Christopher Irby v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm
State this year that left the tech-loving Sandler disappointed. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:32 pm
In Rassekh Sobh v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:32 pm
In Rassekh Sobh v. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm
Washington, which seems to waffle between declarant's and questioner's perspectives. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:26 am
Another is Adams v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
In Case R 513/2011-2 Société des Produits Nestlé S.A v Cadbury Holdings Ltd, Nestlé appealed a decision of the Cancellation Division finding the three-dimensional Community trade mark, consisting of four trapezoidal bars aligned on a rectangular base for 'Sweets; bakery products, pastries, biscuits; cakes, waffles' in Class 30, was devoid of distinctive character and had therefore been invalidly registered contrary to Art. 7(1)(b), Reg. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:10 pm
Appeal of district court’s denial of defendant’s motion to enter judgment on PJC was not properly before Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
