Search for: "State v. Wages" Results 41 - 60 of 9,401
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2024, 7:59 am by Tobin Admin
When asked to describe the impact, the employee stated, “[v]ery light, not harsh at all,” and said he hit the plaintiff with his shoulder. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
”  After petitioners sued Flowers and two of its subsidiaries for violating state and federal wage laws, Flowers moved to compel arbitration. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:18 pm by Duane Morris
The Naranjo decision, in a … Continue reading "California Employer’s Good Faith Defense to Wage Statement Penalties Recognized by State’s Supreme Court" [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:44 am
But, here, the Legislature probably didn't intend to penalize employers for good faith mistakes -- including but not limited to good faith mistakes regarding legality -- for errors made on a wage statement. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am by vforberger
Dep’t of Labor had explicitly directed states to NOT charge administrative concealment penalties for PUA benefits and BEFORE the U.S. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
An employee is “an individual who provides services or labor for an employer for wages or other remuneration,” an employer is “a person or entity . . . who engages the services or labor of an employee to be performed in the United States for wages or other remuneration,” and employment is “any service or labor performed by an employee for an employer within the United States. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
As stated by the tribunal in this case, “clear, convincing and cogent evidence is required to satisfy the balance of probabilities test”. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
As stated by the tribunal in this case, “clear, convincing and cogent evidence is required to satisfy the balance of probabilities test”. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” The focus on labor is also consistent with Guideline 10, which notes that the FTC and DOJ will examine whether a merger between “buyers of labor” may substantially lessen competition and result in “lower wages or slower wage growth, worsening benefits or working conditions, or other degradation of workplace quality. [read post]