Search for: "State v. Wales"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
“A tenor, all singers above…” On 7 December 2023, BBC Wales carried the headline “Covid: Johnson blamed Welsh rates on singing and obesity, inquiry hears“, stating: “Ex-prime minister Boris Johnson blamed Wales’ high Covid rates in the pandemic on “the singing and the obesity”, according to the diary of his chief scientific adviser at the time. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:11 am
While most of the attention regarding artificial intelligence and copyright has been centred in the United States, it’s useful to remember that one of the main pieces of litigation is taking place in the courts of England and Wales. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
While no appeal had been lodged before the Court of Justice, on 14 June 2018 KS and other direct family members of victims brought an action against the EU before a (former) Member State’s court, the High Court of Justice of England & Wales, in the Tomanović case (and another action directed against the Foreign and Commonwealth Office). [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
I would add that the same is true of the relevance of the creative process, especially if this was intended as an intention to create something 'artistic': the author’s state of mind, intention, sanity or lack thereof count and should count 0. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 4:55 am
” The CJEU and religious dress at work On 29 November, the CJEU will hand down judgment in the latest case on religious dress at work: OP v Commune d’Ans Case C‑148/22, which is a request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du Travail de Liège. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am
Former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Tom Bingham, in his book “The Rule of Law”, while explaining the rule of fair trial cited a House of Lords’s case “Regina v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
Master Bell stated that he “thought long and hard about whether or not to strike out Ms O’Neill’s action in the light of this jurisprudence and came close to doing so” [46]. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:27 pm
If you have any questions regarding the matters raised in this article, please contact the authors. [1] CCIG Investments Pty Ltd v Schokman [2023] HCA 21 at [4]-[6]. [2] Ibid at [12], citing Bugge v Brown (1919) 26 CLR 110 at 118; New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511 at 589 [223]; Sweeney v Boylan Nominees Pty Ltd (2006) 226 CLR 161 at 173 [33]; Prince Alfred College Inc v ADC (2016) 258 CLR 134 at 148 [40]. [3] Ibid at [14]. [4] Schokman… [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 2 November 2023, the District Court of New South Wales struck out and dismissed proceedings in the case of Woolf v Brandt [2023] NSWDC 460 on the basis that they were brought outside the limitation period. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 8:02 am
easyGroup’s claim, lodged in the Chancery Division of the High Court of England and Wales [easyGroup v Easy Life, case ref IL-2023-000156], stated that not only were the band using the EASYLIFE mark but that they had also promoted their ‘Life's a Beach’ tour, in 2021 and 2022, with a poster, merchandise and website showing a plane in the style of EasyJet's [registered] orange. easyGroup argued that the band was “riding on the coat… [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
The overlooked majority: the limits of Whitney v CIRRichard Thomas (First Tier Tribunal, UK)7. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:24 am
Ayinla v London Borough of Newham. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:27 am
In Ponticelli UK Ltd v Gallagher, the Inner House of the Court of Session held that employee share incentive plans, even if explicitly stated to be non-contractual (and not referred to in the employment contract) arise “in connection with” the employee’s employment. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
The PCT application names the three inventors as inventors and as applicants for the United States of America (US) only. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm
An analysis of the document has been issued by the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England & Wales. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
But a cursory comparison of the equivalent piece of Australian federal legislation to the legislation at issue in Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo suggests it is at least not true in all cases. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
In the recent UK Supreme Court decision O (a minor), R (on the application of v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKSC 3, Lord Hodge provided a pithy statement of the approach of the courts in that jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
More specifically, in his opinion last Term dissenting from a denial of cert in Buffington v. [read post]
