Search for: "State v. Weisberg" Results 41 - 60 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2014, 8:01 am by Hillary A. Frommer
 In Estate of Weisberg, decided on April 8, 2014, the court addressed the issue of marriage. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:51 am by Zoe Tillman
Second, they argued that prosecutors withheld potentially exculpatory evidence in violation of the precedent set in Brady v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 3:48 pm by Lawrence Solum
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 2:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The clear engagement letters govern the terms of the parties' relationship and, as a matter of law, cannot be altered by alleged parol or extrinsic evidence (see, Italia Imports, Inc. v Weisberg & Lesk, 220 AD2d 226, 227). [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by Lawrence Solum
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:33 am
Here is the abstract.This chapter for Criminal Law Stories (Robert Weisberg & Donna Coker eds., 2010), tells the story of State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 10:02 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Jeannie Suk (Harvard University - Harvard Law School) has posted 'The Look in His Eyes': The Story of State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 3:44 pm
Bandes 413 States of War: Defensive Force Among Nations Guyora Binder 439 TERM PAPER Herring v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:40 am
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:00 pm
Previously both Jennifer Millner Weisberg and I blogged on a highly publicized New Jersey family law case, Fawzy v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
ReferencesBaird & Weisberg, Rules, Standards, and the Battle of the Forms: A Reassessment of § 2-207, 68 Virginia Law Review 1217 (1982). [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:17 pm
Today is the deadline for amicus briefs in support of the respondent state in Giles v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:02 pm
  As the indictment noted:"The 'Compensation of Directors' section of the 2003 Form 10-K state, in substance and in part, that Xybernaut's directors, including WEISBERG, were paid $1,000 per board meeting and received options to purchase 10,000 Xybernaut shares annually. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:40 pm
References Baird & Weisberg, Rules, Standards, and the Battle of the Forms: A Reassessment of § 2-207, 68 Virginia Law Review 1217 (1982). [read post]