Search for: "State v. Whitener"
Results 41 - 60
of 115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 11:13 am
For instance, the FTC cites 1975’s Goldfarb v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:54 pm
State Bar of Arizona; Goldfarb v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 10:49 am
The trial judge stated that he was taking into account "all the circumstances, including the compensatory awards already made", but it is unclear on what basis he did so. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 6:27 pm
Justice Laskin cited Prinzo v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am
That is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 12:18 pm
Most of them have been pretty cut and dried, but the recent decision in Whitener, v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:54 am
At the Liberty Blog, Tim Sandefur discusses the amicus brief that the Pacific Legal Foundation and the Cato Institute filed in “a case involving teeth whiteners” and the question whether “‘mere protectionism’ qualif[ies] as a ‘legitimate state interest’ under the lenient ‘rational basis’ rule. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 12:41 am
Bona Law also filed an amicus brief in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 9:19 am
The District Court case in California: Sulitzer v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Supreme Court held in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:57 am
Citing People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 7:56 pm
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:11 pm
In NC Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 2:26 pm
See Marrache v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:07 am
That case is North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:01 am
Johnson said minority enrollment has fallen despite the United States Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Grutter v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:48 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
There are many cases where such allegations are considered in the context of punitive damages or bad faith analysis (see, for example, Whiten v. [read post]
