Search for: "State v. Woo"
Results 41 - 60
of 154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2016, 2:35 pm
Woody Woo, Inc., and stated that tips are the property of the employee whether or not the employer has taken a tip credit and that a valid tip pool may only include “those employees who customarily and regularly receive tips. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 1:57 pm
Woo Young Medical Co., ___ F. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 9:06 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
See Cumbie v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:08 am
In Cumbie v Woody Woo, Inc, a 2010 decision, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the FLSA does not prohibit an employer from instituting a tip pool that includes back-of-the-house workers if that employer pays its employees who share in tips the full minimum wage and does not take a tip credit. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 8:46 am
Kim Woo Ki, chairman of Elpreya, stated that the brand name Starpreya was derived from the name Freja, a Norse goddess. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 12:08 pm
I think the Cadence v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
WHD will seek to enforce this position in the states making up the Ninth Circuit -- Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington -- notwithstanding that court’s decision in Cumbie v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:30 am
Case citation: Congoo, LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:10 am
Back in June 2007, IPBiz noted that a response of patent practitioners to KSR v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 6:44 am
Greenwich Taxi, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:09 pm
Therefore, employers complying with state law minimum wages will not have to worry about the FLSA when constructing tip pools.The case is Cumbie v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:56 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Cumbie v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:56 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Cumbie v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:19 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Cumbie v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 3:36 pm
Such existing remedies often yield bizarre results as we saw in the Woo v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 5:23 am
Woody Woo, Inc., 596 F.3d 577 (9th Cir. 2010). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:11 am
Woody Woo, Inc., 596 F.3d 577, 583 (9th Cir. 2010). [4] 76 Fed. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 1:07 pm
Although CNN calls it "funny" news, the Washington Supreme Court held in Woo v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 6:08 pm
Woo v. [read post]
