Search for: "State v. a Quantity of Copies of Books"
Results 41 - 60
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2014, 4:12 am
The most important smartphone IP ruling in the months ahead is going to be the opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the Oracle v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
Lee v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Having read many posts by Falkvinge (as well as many law books), I don’t get the impression that he’s actually opened many law books himself. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:10 pm
Like any saavy entrepreneur, he had family and friends overseas purchase quantities of such books, which he then sold on ebay, turning a neat six-figure profit. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:55 am
Before yesterday’s ruling in the Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:15 am
So she sits down with an advance copy of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix--the fifth book--and proceeds to transcribe. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
Stated motivation: “Brand is a guarantee for quality. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:06 pm
He alleges defendant is again allowing third-parties to sell copies of his book without plaintiff’s authorization, but he does not claim that any of the books being sold on defendant’s website are counterfeit copies. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am
Caselaw: There are many books and thousands of cases that discuss what these rights mean. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
Posner wrote: [The user’s] bypassing Flava’s pay wall by viewing the uploaded copy is equivalent to stealing a copyrighted book from a bookstore and reading it. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:54 am
The quotes come directly from the three major fair dealing decisions: CCH Canadian, Access Copyright, and SOCAN v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
© 2012 by the American Bar Association. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
See R. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:16 am
Moreover, a unanimous court dismissed claims of economic harm from the copying (with echoes of the recent Georgia State University fair use decision) and in the SOCAN v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:13 am
Abella also rejects claims that buying full books for all students is an alternative to copying an excerpt: buying books for each student is not a realistic alternative to teachers copying short excerpts to supplement student textbooks. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:13 am
The court states: Teachers have no ulterior motive when providing copies to students. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am
There are some very nice and straightforward clarifications in the recent Federal Court decision inWarman v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:25 pm
Factor Three – Amount and Substantiality of the Portion Taken Factor three requires consideration of both the quantity and the value of the amount copied in relation to the overall book. [read post]
23 May 2012, 9:23 am
The laws on the books, it turns out, offer us cold comfort when it comes to privacy from intrusion by our government.CourtsSo what about case law? [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
