Search for: "States Pre-Disposition Services, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2011, 12:12 pm
The Defense policy excludes pre-existing “threats” of infringement, not the actual infringing activity itself. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am
Nevils, a case asking whether the Federal Employee Health Benefits Act pre-empts state anti-subrogation laws. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 10:40 pm
As we know, trademarks, service marks, and trade names are not among them. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 819 F. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
Miller, and Medical Marketing Resources SE, Inc. v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
Frederick Douglass Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
Frederick Douglass Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
The Role of the Attorney General A key distinction from winding up and dissolving an ordinary corporation is that the Attorney General of the State of California (the “AG”) must receive notice and may play a role in the ultimate disposition of assets. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
The Role of the Attorney General A key distinction from winding up and dissolving an ordinary corporation is that the Attorney General of the State of California (the “AG”) must receive notice and may play a role in the ultimate disposition of assets. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
The Role of the Attorney General A key distinction from winding up and dissolving an ordinary corporation is that the Attorney General of the State of California (the “AG”) must receive notice and may play a role in the ultimate disposition of assets. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 2:05 pm
Junkins & Assocs., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 12:01 am
See Quiksilver, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:11 am
(“Quickway”), through its affiliates, has terminals with trucking operations throughout the United States, including a terminal in Louisville, Kentucky that only provided services for a national grocery chain. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
We affirm. * * * [I] In the case at bar, the fact that Swan Lake had no control over the manner in which Hiles performed his services is not dispositive because there is evidence of probative value to support a finding that the rotten purlins were a cause of Hiles's fall. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., holding that the first-sale doctrine [17 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Justice Eva Guzman agreed on this disposition, but wrote a separate concurring opinion addressing the implications for the ethical responsibilities of attorneys in their dealings with prospective clients. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Koerner & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
Koerner & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 10:23 am
Nov. 30, 2022), concerned a class action for claims against Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC (collectively “Uber”). [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 11:58 am
Victim Service Coordinator, Durant, OK. [read post]
