Search for: "Stein v Stein" Results 41 - 60 of 977
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2023, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to the Judiciary Law § 487 cause of action, the plaintiff failed to allege with specificity any material misstatements of fact made by the attorney defendants in the divorce action with the intent to deceive that court (see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178 [2020]; see also Looff v Lawton, 97 NY 478, 482 [1884]). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
This has included divine beings (Urantia Found. v Kristen Maaherra), gardens (Kelley v Chicago Park District) and monkeys (Naruto v Slater). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
This has included divine beings (Urantia Found. v Kristen Maaherra), gardens (Kelley v Chicago Park District) and monkeys (Naruto v Slater). [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 4:37 am by Aleksandra Czubek
  Marcel Pemsel analysed the General Court’s judgment in Apart v EUIPO - S. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
   Now out from behind a paywall: Law & Laundry: White Laundresses, Chinese Laundrymen, and the Origins of Muller v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Fred Yen: These interface problems have existed since Lotus v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:58 am by Seth Davis
Election Law and the FEC Minor party candidates for president suffered a defeat in Stein v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Welcome to this all-source repository of information for analysts, researchers, investigators, journalists, educators, and the public at large. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:06 pm by Benjamin Goh
Henry Yang followed up on his previous reporting on the Interdigital v Lenovo FRAND judgment of the High Court of England and Wales, and analysed in detail the first part (of three) of the judgement regarding comparable licenses and determination of a FRAND rate. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The deceit under Judiciary Law § 487 and fraud claims were insufficiently pleaded because they do not identify any misrepresentation made by defendants (see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178 [2020]; Eurycleia Partners, LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, 12 NY3d 553, 559 [2009]; CPLR 3016 [b]). [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
This sense of principle is illustrated by Ronald Dworkin's example of the principle that no one should be allowed to profit from their own wrong, drawn from the case of Riggs v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to the Judiciary Law § 487 cause of action, the plaintiff failed to allege with specificity any material misstatements of fact made by the attorney defendants in the divorce action with the intent to deceive that court (see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178; see also Looff v Lawton, 97 NY 478, 482). [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Lorianne Updike Toler The Supreme Court announced its decision in Haaland v. [read post]