Search for: "Stephen Gilles" Results 41 - 60 of 157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2018, 10:19 am by Stephen Wermiel
Justice Stephen Breyer is fond of telling audiences that the story of the Supreme Court is that there is no story, that everything is in the published opinions of the court. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm by Samuel Bray
(Exceptions are posts by Stephen Sachs and Howard Wasserman.) [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:26 am by Howard Wasserman
I agree with Stephen's post about Gill's foreshadowing of the demise of the universal injunction. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am by Alan Morrison
  But if the court were to follow its strict approach to standing (see most recently Gill v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 8:14 am by David Gans
If there was a bright spot in yesterday’s rulings, it was Justice Elena Kagan’s concurring opinion in Gill, joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Stephen Breyer, which cogently recognized the multiple constitutional harms wrought by partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:19 pm by Mark Walsh
The chief justice announces that “I have the opinion in Number 16-1161, Gill v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Adam Feldman
Some holdups are still in play, including the long-since-argued case of Gill v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:38 am by Silver Law Group
According to FINRA Disciplinary actions for May 2018, the following individuals were barred from FINRA and cannot currently work for a FINRA brokerage firm for failing to provide FINRA with information it requested or to keep information current with FINRA pursuant to FINRA rules: NAME FORMER EMPLOYERS   Stephen Robert Adams   BBVA Securities Inc. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:21 am by Adam Feldman
We can also note that Justices Stephen Breyer and Sotomayor tend to speak the most. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:54 am by First Mondays
For the latter, we theorize about why the Supreme Court is hearing another partisan-gerrymandering case when Gill v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
” In a second post at Cato at Liberty, Shapiro and Stephens argue for a cert grant in Contest Promotions v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:26 pm by Amy Howe
” They told the justices that there “is no reason to treat this case differently from” Gill v. [read post]