Search for: "Stephens v. Social Security Administration"
Results 41 - 60
of 230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2016, 5:14 pm
” The Veterans Administration (past and present) and the Social Security Administration (prospectively) are theaters of operations for large expansions of firearms prohibitions without congressional consent. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
Forte, Andrew Geronimo, Raymond Ku, Stephen Lazarus, Kevin Francis O'Neill, Margaret Christine Tarkington, Aaron H. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am
Berryhill, in which the court held that an administrative judge in a social security disability benefits case can rely on testimony by a vocational expert that an applicant can do “other work,” even if the expert does not provide the data she used to form her opinion. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 1:55 pm
Supreme Court’s 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
Most of the elements of social credit have already been developed in the West. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 12:52 pm
We will be arguing Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:06 pm
In SCOTUSBlog, Professor Stephen Vladeck wondered how much was truly left of the Webster v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am
” Yesterday the Supreme Court ruled in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
Today the court hears oral argument in Dean v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am
Benjamin Farley considered the Trump administration’s influence on Periodic Review at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:11 am
Smith, Brian V. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
[Hall v Wandsworth at 29]Mitu v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 1249 is taken as an explanation of Hall, when Lewison LJ says:Section 203 (4) distinguishes between a “decision” and an “issue”. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
[Hall v Wandsworth at 29]Mitu v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 1249 is taken as an explanation of Hall, when Lewison LJ says:Section 203 (4) distinguishes between a “decision” and an “issue”. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 4:55 am
April Doss examined the Trump administration’s proposals to examine the social media accounts of visitors to the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Hickman (1989) and Ontario (Public Safety and Security) v Criminal Lawyers’ Association (2010). [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 4:50 pm
V. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.Driesen, David M. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:22 am
It would cause administrative chaos, and would inevitably have significant economic implications, if the regulations were now to be quashed. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 7:01 am
” While it acknowledged the examples cited by supporters of the CFPB, such as the single Administrator of the Social Security Administration (SSA) and sole officer of the Office of the Special Counsel (OSC), the Court concluded that the examples are relatively recent and extremely controversial. [read post]
