Search for: "Steve Salop"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2009, 9:15 am
Confirmed participants thus far (with a number of pending invites) include: Dennis Carlton (Chicago GSB) Dan Crane (Michigan Law) Herbert Hovenkamp (Iowa) Einer Elhauge (Harvard) Luke Froeb (Vanderbilt) Andrew Gavil (Howard) Thom Lambert (Missouri) Geoff Manne (LECG) Steve Salop (Georgetown) Joseph Simons (Paul Weiss) Danny Sokol (Florida) Josh Wright (George Mason) Paul Yde (Freshfields) [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:44 pm
Confirmed panelists include Maurice Stucke (University of Tennessee), Steve Salop (Georgetown University), Avishalom Tor (Haifa University), and Josh Wright (George Mason University). [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 12:37 pm
Steve Salop has argued that a problem with the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) 2020 vertical merger guidelines is that they failed to adopt anticompetitive presumptions. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:03 am
HT: Steve Salop. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 11:45 pm
As regular readers may recall, we have had a few posts on the topic, including a spirited exchange when Steve Salop was visiting a few weeks ago. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:22 am
Confirmed panelists include Maurice Stucke (University of Tennessee), Steve Salop (Georgetown University), Avishalom Tor (Haifa University), and Josh Wright (George Mason University). [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:31 pm
Georgetown’s group with Steve Salop, Kathy Zeiler, Josh Teitelbaum and Howard Shelanski coming over from Berkeley (just mentioning the PhD’s I know off the top of my head so sorry if I missed someone!) [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 12:11 pm
As regular readers may recall, we have had a few posts on the topic, including a spirited exchange when Steve Salop was visiting a few weeks ago. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:13 pm
Joe Farrell, Welcome from the Agencies Dennis Carlton, Revising the Guidelines Luke Froeb, Merger Enforcement without Market Definition Robert Gertner, Revising the Guidelines Steve Salop, Comments on Updating the Merger Guidelines David Teece and J. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 5:30 am
Steve Salop and Jennifer Sturiale have an interesting piece arguing, in light of West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:11 am
The Economists Submission makes a simple but important point, and I was very pleased (and flattered) to be asked to join the list of distinguished economists endorsing the analysis (led by Steve Salop, and including Mike Baye, Aaron Edlin, Richard Gilbert, Jerry Hausman, Dan Rubinfeld, Richard Schmalansee, and Lawrence White). [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 10:24 pm
HT goes to Steve Salop for pointing me to the Guerilla Grafter story. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 3:40 pm
[thanks to Steve Salop for the heads-up on this issue] [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:33 pm
The economist cited invokes the countervailing power defense argument raised by Steve Salop. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 1:36 pm
., Steve Salop's recent guest post here at TOTM on this issue in a different context). [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 9:17 pm
Virtually every antitrust scholar to examine the goals of the Sherman Act, including those who disagree with Bork’s “consumer welfare” (read: total welfare) interpretation, have concluded that the antitrust laws represented a myriad of goals including: economic efficiency, protection of (a la Steve Salop) “true” consumer welfare, and political concerns. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:53 am
Ross case, decided last Thursday, the Court has again fallen into what Steve Salop and I called, many years ago, the "Tidewater voting paradox. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:52 pm
But Republican administrations have also squandered the opportunity to address this issue in previous iterations of the Merger Guidelines and (as Steve Salop has pointed out) the Commentaries and so should not be let off the hook. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm
” A recent, interesting discussion on X (the platform formerly known as Twitter), involving Geoff Manne, Herb Hovenkamp, Steve Salop, and others illustrated some of the complexity in implementation. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 8:19 am
Antitrust Matters provides engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
