Search for: "Steven Mazie"
Results 41 - 60
of 530
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2020, 4:42 am
” Briefly: Steven Mazie of the Economist wraps up the court’s 2019-20 term, writing that Chief Justice John Roberts “presided over a court that broke left and right about equally in cases involving religion, abortion, civil rights and presidential power. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:56 am
” Steven Mazie has this article (subscription or registration may be required for full access) in the July 18, 2020 issue of The Economist. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
” Steven Mazie of the Economist says Chief Justice John Roberts employed a “pox-on-both-your-houses analysis” before kicking the Mazars subpoenas back to the lower courts. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am
” Additional coverage comes from Tyler Olson and others at Fox News, Tucker Higgins and Dan Mangan at CNBC, and Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Espresso blog. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie writes that “[a]cting boldly through superficially small steps—and getting credit for aisle-crossing while giving liberals at best temporary solace—seems to be panning out well for Chief Justice Roberts[:] He is cultivating a reputation for non-partisanship at the Supreme Court while advancing primarily conservative goals. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Espresso blog, Steven Mazie observes that “[f]or the first time since 1996 it is July and the Supreme Court still has cases to rule on[; w]ith eight decisions to go in a term disrupted by covid-19, the justices are saving some closely watched cases for last. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at the “defiant jurisprudence” of Justice Clarence Thomas, who is completing his 29th year on the Supreme Court bench this term. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 10:32 am
” Steven Mazie has this article in the June 27, 2020 issue of The Economist. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:40 am
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Espresso blog, Steven Mazie notes that “today a legal tussle over whether the House Judiciary Committee may see portions of the [Mueller] report that were redacted before its release in April 2019 comes to a head”: “[O]n May 8th the Supreme Court temporarily blocked the disclosure, allowing the Department of Justice a chance to request that the court take another look. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:56 am
For The Economist, Steven Mazie predicts after Tuesday’s oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:25 am
Amy Howe and Steven Mazie of Bard High School Early College will lead an interactive discussion with middle school students about what happened in oral argument and possible consequences for the separation of powers. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
” At The Economist’s Espresso blog, Steven Mazie notes that “[p]recedent is not friendly to Mr Trump’s plea[:] When Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton faced other predicaments involving the separation of powers, the Supreme Court decided against both, unanimously. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
” For The Economist, Steven Mazie highlights the “tension between principle and practicality” in Chiafalo v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:53 am
Amy Howe and Steven Mazie of Bard High School Early College will lead an interactive discussion with middle school students, starting with previews of the cases and then addressing questions related to separation of powers. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am
” Additional coverage comes from Kevin Daley at The Washington Free Beacon and Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Espresso blog. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:57 am
” Supreme Court reporter and teacher Steven Mazie gives a video rundown on how the coronavirus pandemic is affecting the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:38 pm
“The Supreme Court in the Era of COVID-19”: Steven Mazie, who covers the U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:26 am
Vance Amy Howe, Howe on the Court | Steven Mazie, Bard High School Early College Preview: May 7, 12 p.m. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am
At The Economist, Steven Mazie writes that “[e]ven with their sharpening divisions on other matters, the justices may agree that the pandemic should not provide cover for arbitrarily shelving constitutional rights. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 3:55 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie notes that although “[t]he justices, wary of covid-19’s threat, have themselves suspended hearings for the first time since 1918,” in Republican National Committee v. [read post]
