Search for: "Steven A. Strickland" Results 41 - 60 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2010, 8:09 pm by Gideon
As I mentioned before, Justice Stevens gave us a delicious quote to use and rely on: We, however, have never applied a distinction between direct and collateral consequences to define the scope of constitutionally “reasonable professional assistance” required under Strickland, 466 U. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:31 pm by Caesar and Napoli, P.C.
“Liberties were stomped on,” said Tea Party-backed Republican representative Jonathan Strickland to the department head, “Do you understand the outrage on this issue? [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:31 pm by Caesar and Napoli, P.C.
“Liberties were stomped on,” said Tea Party-backed Republican representative Jonathan Strickland to the department head, “Do you understand the outrage on this issue? [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:10 am
The third step requires a Strickland-like showing: “prejudice,” meaning a “reasonable probability” that the error affected the outcome. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:45 am
Strickland rejected that last week. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am by cdw
Strickland in Ohio has granted a commutation to Sidney Cornwell, which means, save for the Baze v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am by John Elwood
The Magnuson-Stevens Act governs the management of fisheries in federal waters and provides that the National Marine Fisheries Service may require vessels to carry federal observers onboard to enforce agency regulations to prevent overfishing. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Dem 24th (916) 319-2024 Berryhill, Bill Rep 26th (916) 319-2026 Berryhill, Tom Rep 25th (916) 319-2025 Blakeslee, Sam Rep … [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by admin
., Learning, Memory & Cognition, 378 (2011). [4] Strickland v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Kulbicki, a case on last week’s Conference at which the Court has been asked to review whether a court violates Strickland v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:18 am by Steve Hall
Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va., backed him up.The case had attracted some attention lately because Solicitor General Elena Kagan -- now the nominee to replace Justice John Paul Stevens -- opposed Supreme Court review. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:55 am
(SCOTUS did the same power move in Miranda and Strickland and hell, even Marbury v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:04 pm by Michael Froomkin
With the very able help of my research assistant,  Steven Strickland, I’ve written a memo which outlines some of the advantages of using STV and sent it to each of the five members of the Coral Gables Commission. [read post]