Search for: "Steven Henning"
Results 41 - 60
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2017, 4:14 am
” In The New York Times, Peter Henning reports that “the Supreme Court will have two opportunities” — in Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
’ Dove stated: `[W]hen they did the ITD run—when I have my probationers I use my own personal DMV and—to run myself because I don't run other people's information. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman considers the remedy question, observing that “[w]hen the claim is that the laws are treating one group differently than the other, there are two choices: Extend the advantageous treatment to the disadvantaged group or extend the disadvantage to everyone,” “[a]nd that depends on statutory design. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:03 pm
Steven D. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:59 am
Robin Bravender reports for Greenwire that, “[w]hen President Obama moves out of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. next January, his environmental legacy won’t be entirely clear. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:32 pm
” But as Wayne State Law Professor Peter Henning and Berkeley Law Professor Steven Davidoff Solomon noted in an April 20, 2016 post on the New York Times Dealbook blog (here), merely because the company’s shares are not publicly traded “does not exempt the company from the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 12:28 pm
-Steven Silverberg [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 12:28 pm
-Steven Silverberg [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 12:28 pm
-Steven Silverberg [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 8:24 am
The article by Steven Erlanger, Step hen Castle and Rick Gladstone, titled “Airing of Hidden Wealth Stirs Inquiries and Rage” — illustrates some of the disasters that strike when “hidden” assets are suddenly not hidden anymore. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:27 pm
Singapore Defense Minister Ng Eng Hen expressed concern about growing South China Sea militarization, worrying that Asia “doesn’t have an equivalent of never again should a conflagration arise in Asia” and therefore is more at risk of unintended conflict. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:16 pm
It is worth noting, however, that the Humanitarian Law Project Court made clear that it wasn’t interested in making its own judgments about what does or does not support terrorists and would instead defer to Congress and the Executive (who were notably both in agreement about the threat posed): “[W]hen it comes to collecting evidence and drawing factual inferences in this area, ‘the lack of competence on the part of the courts is marked,’ and respect for the… [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
Juan A. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:04 am
Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952) that ‘‘[w]hen the President acts pursuant to an express or implied authorization of Congress, his authority is at its maximum, for it includes all that he possesses in his own right plus all that Congress can delegate’’; and Whereas ISIL, through the use of social media and its online magazine, Dabiq, seeks to radicalize Americans and to inspire attacks within the homeland: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of… [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 10:46 am
” Emwazi was suspected of murdering several foreign hostages, including Steven Sotlff, James Foley, Abdul-Rahman Kassig, Alan Henning, David Haines, and Kenji Goto. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:40 am
Let’s say you were in the backyard coop, collecting eggs for breakfast and got attacked by an aggressive hen. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[vii] “Courtesy is an essential element of effective advocacy,” agrees Justice John Paul Stevens. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 1:31 pm
Justice Stevens, in the plurality Bazzle opinion, stated that “arguably the interpretation of the parties’ agreement should have been made in the first instance by the arbitrator. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
” (emphasis added)), available at http://causeofaction.org/assets/uploads/2015/08/Hillary-Clinton-Email-Memo-8.24.15.pdf. [4] 95 U.S. 486 (1969) (Warren, C.J.). [5] 514 U.S. 779 (1995) (Stevens, J.). [6] See U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
