Search for: "Stevens v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
Stevens made it clear in his talk that he is still upset about the Supreme Court's March 29 decision in Connick v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:34 pm
Richner v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:34 pm
Richner v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
He wrote the opinion for the Court in the first case I argued, Chisom v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 10:47 am
In 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:30 pm
The Superior Court panel, consisting of Judges Stevens, Lazarus, and Colville, largely adopted Judge Moss’s analysis and affirmed in a signed, but unpublished, opinion by Judge Lazarus. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:30 am
In a case appellate first impression of Rush v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
Were things any different in that respect under Chief Justice Vinson, and if so, do you have any views about whether either mode of decision-making is superior to the other? [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Schiavenza, Assistant Attorney General, Steven M. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
This blog post mentioned that Alameda County Superior Court Judge Steven A. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
Feb. 13, 2024 Murray, J., Lazarus, J., and Stevens, P.J.E.) [read post]
25 May 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Roy v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 1:00 pm
Superior Court (Rehearing petition filed Circuit City Stores, Inc., real party in interest by Steven B. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 3:00 am
In the case of Hammons v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
Attorney Steven B. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
Stevens (2000) 529 U.S. 765 (Vermont Agency). [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 2:00 am
Dean Wilcox v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
Feb. 19, 2016 Stevens, Lazarus, Ott)(Op. by Stevens, J.), Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the trial court’s denial of post-trial motions following the entry of a defense verdict. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 8:20 am
The Court said that the trial judge "is in a superior position" to make that decision. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 7:16 am
Updating this entry on Wednesday's Supreme Court decision in Clark County Council and Clark County Auditor v. [read post]
