Search for: "Still v. Lance"
Results 41 - 60
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2014, 9:11 am
Because of the 1994 Supreme Court decision in Farmer v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:59 am
If you are so inclined, there is still plenty of time to write one. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Lance v. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 12:00 am
If they choose to withdraw their application then they will receive a US$138,000 refund (80% of the fee) [that's still a disbursement cost of US$34,500 to get this far, the same as just over 200 UK trade mark applications - Merpel]. [read post]
29 May 2024, 8:00 am
Vior (Julie) v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:06 am
The case, Lance v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
Snyder v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:39 am
[Still trying to work out how these paragraphs relate to one another. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 3:01 pm
LANCE M. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
Burton of Hogan Lovells on the firm’s blog, Focus on Regulation Morotola v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:59 pm
Dold, Timothy V. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:19 am
Konishi V. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
In SKS Assocs. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 2:16 pm
Still unclear. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
Lance v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:24 pm
Part #2: Progress v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:54 am
" (Bonz Group (Pty) Ltd v Cooke [1994] 3 N.Z.L.R. 216). [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
The relevant cases, all in our duty to test cheat sheet, are: Lance v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:47 pm
The U.S. doctrine of (non-)self-executing treaties remains a point of contestation in the wake of the Supreme Court’s still-debated judgment in Medellín v. [read post]
