Search for: "Stills v. Superior Court of California"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2023, 11:42 pm
The Monterey County Superior Court invalidated the measure, concluding that it was preempted by contrary, longstanding state law. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
EPA and Biden v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:42 am
So now that the writ proceedings are over, the trial can restart.Which is fine, and the California Supreme Court notes that as long as the jury is still empaneled -- which at oral argument the parties confirmed -- that same jury can get back together and resolve the matter on remand.But the opening arguments here were over two years ago. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 3:08 pm
Zarco Hotels, Inc., Case No. 21STCV00023 (Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles) You can download a copy of the Court’s Order here. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 4:34 pm
In late June, California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal upheld a Superior Court decision in Save Our Access v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
At the same time, well, you know, sometimes, statutes are ambiguous, and we punish you anyway if you violate what the courts subsequently say is the superior reading of the statute. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 12:15 am
Superior Court, 46 Cal.4th 993, 1003–1004 (2009). [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
Superior Court (1961) 188 CA2d 300, 304. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:15 pm
California Supreme Court Issues Its Ruling On July 6, 2023, the California Supreme Court answered no to both of those questions. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
State of California, Dept. of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 7:55 am
There will still be some time until the court comes to a decision on the matter. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:19 pm
Superior Court, 13 Cal. 4th 893, 939-40 (1996); Customer Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:42 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:17 am
” California v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 2:47 pm
Harris, decided Friday by the California Court of Appeal, in an opinion by L.A. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:53 am
Lora Reinbold–now retired, but still busy in court) invoked Section 230(c)(2)(A) to justify blocking her constituents. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
(Yu v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:42 pm
On appeal, the California AG's Office confessed error, and the Court of Appeal agrees, reversing and ordering the trial court to order Mr. [read post]
