Search for: "Stokeling v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2018, 3:54 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
Rory Little analyzes Tuesday’s opinion in Stokeling v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 1:23 pm
In Stokeling v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
United States, 16-8616, Stokeling v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Stokeling v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:24 pm
Oliveira, and Justice Thomas with opinion in Stokeling v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
Before you get too excited, it looks like 56 of them are Armed Career Criminal Act cases the court has been holding for Stokeling v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
Stokeling v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 12:39 pm
Earlier this month, for instance, Chief Justice John Roberts surprised many by dissenting in Stokeling v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:05 pm
Stitt and Stokeling v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 9:55 am
Alabama, Stokeling v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 10:28 am
The graph below covers all of the justices’ dissents so far this term aside from dissents in the court’s merits decisions (The only dissent from a merits decision so far, in which Roberts and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan joined, was written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor in Stokeling v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
Alabama and one of the first cases in which Kavanaugh participated in oral argument — Stokeling v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 12:50 pm
Although there was a drop off in such cases for the 2017 term, the court heard several salient patent cases last term as well, with Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 3:52 am
Z.B. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
