Search for: "Stone v. Internal Revenue Service"
Results 41 - 60
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:27 am
In Reading Int'l Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design field… [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
The IFPI published their downloadable Digital Music Report 2014 - which showed that music fans’ growing appetite for subscription and streaming services had helped drive recorded music revenue growth in most major music markets in 2013, with overall digital revenues growing 4.3 per cent - and Europe’s music market expanding for the first time in more than a decade. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
Keeble v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:25 am
James Hardie * Another Google AdWords Advertiser Defeats Trademark Infringement Lawsuit * With Rosetta Stone Settlement, Google Gets Closer to Legitimizing Billions of AdWords Revenue * Google Defeats Trademark Challenge to Its AdWords Service * Newly Released Consumer Survey Indicates that Legal Concerns About Competitive Keyword Advertising Are Overblown [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:31 am
This “business model” claim defies basic economics.[19] Another argument against providing creators the rights and remedies they need is that they are successful despite piracy, not being paid for uses, or are earning revenues from other sources. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:52 am
eDiscovery News Content and Considerations 9th Circuit Ruling Hinges on 'Exceeds Authorized Access' in CFAA - http://tinyurl.com/3tu5qja (Ginny LaRoe) Big Data and Tolkien’s Seeing Stone - http://tinyurl.com/42xr82v (Jon Neiditz, John Martin) Biglaw Litigators, Rejoice! [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
Stone, 776 S.W.2d 885, 889 (Mo.App. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court recently granted review in Walker v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:02 pm
Buying Kosher or Halal products doesn’t result in a tax break, even if you’re doing it for a power higher than the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Afro-IP)Australia Professor Fitzgerald’s opinion article ‘It’s vital to sort out ownership of ideas’: (IP:KCE)BrazilBrazil wrestles with decision on GM corn, seed patenting: (Intellectual Property Watch),PTO recognized as international patent search authority: (International Law Office)CanadaTrade mark statistics - CIPO 2006-2007 Annual Report: (Canadian Trademark Blog)IP injunctions in Canada: (ipblog.ca),Professor Ariel Katz’… [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
On the same day there was an application in the case of Holyoake & Anor v Candy & Ors before Warby J. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
As reported by Cheryl Miller in The Recorder, Assemblyman Mark Stone, D-Scotts Valley, and Sen. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
As reported by Cheryl Miller in The Recorder, Assemblyman Mark Stone, D-Scotts Valley, and Sen. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:54 am
Lexmark International Inc. re. [read post]
