Search for: "Strange v. Doe" Results 41 - 60 of 2,028
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2015, 10:43 am
"... by imposing mandatory private enforcement — a limitation unheard — of with regard to state legislatures," wrote Justice Scalia in an opinion called Armstrong v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
When one reads a decision in a pro-se legal malpractice case strange facts often emerge. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:04 pm by Marie S. Newman
Duke Law School does not go out of its way to publicize the fact that the only United States President ever to resign, Richard M. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Strangely, the opinion does not cite either of the two recent Court of Appeal cases on this subject, People ex rel. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 5:21 am by Rose Hughes
  Legal Background: The 3rd Actavis questionThe Actavis questions are used to determine whether an alleged infringement that does not fall under the literal (or normal, purposive) construction of a patent claim, none-the-less falls under the scope of the claim according to the doctrine of equivalents (DoE) as established in Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2017] UKSC 48). [read post]