Search for: "Strange v. Powers"
Results 41 - 60
of 959
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
The sale of offices-as-property may seem strange and even corrupt to modern readers, but it was a long-lasting and practical foundation for the nation-state, modern administration, and colonial expansion.Whereas vénalité had grown out of control in revolutionary-era France, the English had a more stable system of freehold property rights, a distinctive English protection of the officeholders’ investment against “despotic” displacement. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am
The Court of Appeal has been given a similar power to divert from CJEU case law, section 6(4)(b)(i) and (5A) of the amended European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:30 pm
From New York trial judge Shlomo Hagler's opinion released today in Gu v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
And so it is, in prestige, in achievements, in education, in wealth and in power. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
"The judicial Power shall extend to … Cases … [and] to Controversies …" US Constitution, Article III Sec. 2 We all know roughly what that means, right? [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:48 am
Chair: Daphne Keller: EU heavy compliance obligations + a bunch of other laws coming into effect right as platforms are laying off people who know how to do that—a bumpy road. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:59 pm
Speaking truth to power often involves unmasking the untruths that power peddles whenever and wherever profits are at stake. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In 2008, the Court revived the long moribund Second Amendment, holding by a vote of 5-to-4 in District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
Congress did just that in the Ethics in Government Act, but SCOTUS upheld the independent counsel in Morrison v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
But in reality, only a small fraction of this information actually reaches the president; the vast majority is used by rank-and-file government employees who perform a broad range of national security functions to support these presidential powers. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:01 pm
As Justice Alito’s 2017 majority opinion in Matal v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 10:44 am
Precedents like Train v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 1:33 pm
Today, in Sackett v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:07 am
Relying principally on Sternberg v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:30 pm
ShareThursday’s decision in Financial Oversight & Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:30 pm
ShareThursday’s decision in Financial Oversight & Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
As Matt Levine noted, “It is strange to think that boards could issue new shares with unlimited voting power without shareholder approval. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm
Concerning private pacts, Biskupic does a flashback to NFIB v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 7:05 am
After the Supreme Court decided California v. [read post]
