Search for: "Strange v. Strange" Results 41 - 60 of 3,714
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 11:06 am by Mills & Mills LLP
The case of two numbered companies, 1000425140 Ontario Inc. v. 1000176653 Ontario Inc., 2023 ONSC 6688, was actually a lawsuit brought by Canadian basketball player and Oklahoma City Thunder Point Guard Shai Gilgeous-Alexander to set aside his purchase of a home in Burlington, Ontario. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme Court.) [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
The founding generation was also worried about two other kinds of military threat – armed insurrection against state governments from within or, strange though it may seem to us now, invasions of one state by another state or confederation of states. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 1:15 pm by Ryan P. Hiler
Little about the law seemed ripe for dispute or change, nevertheless, in Amgen v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:55 am by Kristy Parker
Few appellate court arguments have been more anticipated than the one happening Tuesday in Trump v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am by Bobby Stroup
For example, one key due date is in Section 8(b)(iv)–(v). [read post]