Search for: "Strauss v. Cir"
Results 41 - 60
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2007, 9:33 pm
”This, the Ninth Circuit found, was based on a misreading of Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:19 pm
The case cite is Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm
Shelley, 344 F.3d 913, 914 (9th Cir. 2003); Valeria v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
” He looked to the seven-factor test in Strauss v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:36 am
" See, e.g., Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:35 am
Last year, the Second Circuit held in Brzak v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm
Geneva Pharms., Inc., 344 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir. 2003) and Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 4:57 am
See Strauss v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 12:43 pm
” In re Strauss,“> 2006 WL 2583645, at *2 (citing Kawaauhau v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Cir. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 12:58 pm
”) Bowman v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:20 am
In re County of Erie, 546 F.3d 222, 228 (2d Cir. 2008) (quoting Sedco Int'l S.A. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 1:37 am
Skinder-Strauss Associates, 640 F.3d 72 (3d Cir. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
”Strauss v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
McDonough, 466 F.3d 970, 979 (11th Cir. 2006) (Rutherford II) (Wilson, J., dissenting); see also Hill v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:03 am
Strauss-Kahn, No. 207065-2011, complaint (N.Y. [read post]