Search for: "Strickland v. Lee*" Results 41 - 60 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
  In 2010 the Court issued a per curiam opinion (after calling for the record and nine relists) summarily vacating a Georgia Superior Court decision for misapplying the second (prejudice) prong of Strickland v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:14 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The state courts failed to correctly apply the "prejudice" prong of Strickland v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
RobertsonThe Tribal Struggle for Indian Sovereignty: The Story of the Cherokee Cases, by Rennard Strickland Water, Legal Rights, and Actual Consequences: The story of Winters v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
Chappell12-5890Issue: (1) In Strickland v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm by John Elwood
Chappell12-5890Issue: (1) In Strickland v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am by Dan Markel
Ryan (Southern Methodist University)   Criminal Justice 09: Criminal Law Stories Time: Fri, Jun 8 - 2:30pm - 4:15pm Place: HHV, TBA20  Session Participants: Chair: Donna Coker (University of Miami) The Story of Wanrow: Reasonableness, Gender, and Self-Defense *Donna Coker (University of Miami) Accomplice Liability and the Murderous Judge *Leo Katz (University of Pennsylvania) Robinson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm by A
On Nov. 3, the 2nd Court ruled in Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
McNeil Docket: 11-295 Issue: (1) Whether the court below properly held that counsel’s failure to strike an openly biased juror does not constitute objectively unreasonable performance under Strickland v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:35 pm by Michael DelSignore
In addressing the claim, the court looked at whether the State court decision involved an unreasonable application of the United States Supreme Court decision on ineffective assistance of counsel, Strickland v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:23 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Lee, 52 M.J. 51, 53 (C.A.A.F. 1999), in light of Strickland v. [read post]