Search for: "Strickland v. Strickland"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2023, 10:18 am
The case, Strickland v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 10:18 am
The case, Strickland v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 10:18 am
The case, Strickland v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:58 am
See Strickland v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:56 am
The standard for evaluating claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in a court-martial is the two-part test established in Strickland v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 8:49 am
Commissioner of Correction (Ineffective assistance of trial counsel; whether petitioner suffered prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:25 am
Whether you’re good with lack of preservation arguments, or the exceptionally low bar of Strickland v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 2:50 pm
For example, in Kroger Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:34 am
Steven Hager PDF Reprint: The Rule of Law: McGirt v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Wiggins: Standby counsel appointed by Court does not violate self-representation right. 1984 Strickland v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 3:00 pm
Supreme Court precedent in Strickland v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 1:53 pm
I’m not above patting myself on the back, and today Judge Sam Lindsay granted a Motion to Dismiss I filed for the defendant in Segovia v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:04 am
See NLRB v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 10:15 am
” However, the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas concluded Andrus failed to meet the applicable burden set in Strickland v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 6:45 am
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:48 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:45 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:39 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
