Search for: "Suite Stay Inc" Results 41 - 60 of 2,397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2011, 6:44 am by Joseph Gribbin
Apr. 18, 2011), Judge Stark granted the plaintiffs' motion to stay pending resolution of the PTO's reexaminations of the patents-in-suit. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:03 pm by Andrew Russell
Sept. 2, 2010) (mem.), denying defendant Superior Essex's motion for a stay pending re-examination of the patents in suit. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 10:00 am by Eric Caligiuri
Flying Crocodile Inc et al, 2-19-cv-01278 (WDWA Dec. 28, 2021), the Court granted defendants’ motion to stay pending ex parte reexamination even though the case had already previously been stayed pending inter partes review. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 9:32 pm
  Section 3 does mandate a stay "[i]n any suit or proceeding" that involves an arbitrable issue, 9 U.S.C. 3, but (as the Third Circuit held) that doesn't mean the whole suit or proceeding must stop in its tracks. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:16 am by Docket Navigator
The court denied defendant's emergency motion to stay pending an inter partes reexamination where the PTO issued an Action Closing Prosecution that rejected all claims of the patent-in-suit. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:15 am by Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion to stay pending inter partes review initiated by a nonparty, but agreed to hold a separate hearing regarding potential estoppel effects. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:20 pm by Coby Nixon
Feb. 18, 2009) (Cooper, J.)Judge Cooper granted Plaintiff’s motions to stay the two actions above pending Plaintiff’s appeal of a claim construction ruling in a third action involving the same five patents-in-suit. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:41 am by Peter J. Sluka
In Stile v C-Air Customhouse Brokers-Forwards, Inc., Index No. 656575/2020 [Sup Ct, New York County 2021], the New York County Supreme Court declined to dismiss a suit by the estate of a shareholder subject to a stay away settlement agreement on the grounds that the stay away obligations did not expressly apply to the shareholder’s successors. [read post]
30 May 2018, 7:12 pm by Scott McKeown
Last week in Wi-Lan, Inc. et al., v LG Electronics, Inc., et al. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:33 pm
  The case was filed in 2005 but was stayed in 2006 when the U.S. [read post]