Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan*"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2010, 8:14 am
Here’s the abstract: The Supreme Court’s unanimous 2002 decision in Swierkiewicz v.... [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
See this blog post for a discussion of the original three-judge panel decision from July, Sullivan v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:31 am
Here is the abstract: New York Times v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:31 am
Here is the abstract: New York Times v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:52 am
Sullivan was famously described by her mentor and professor Lawrence Tribe as “the most extraordinary student I had ever had” and she served as co-counsel in Bowers v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
But the main target is New York Times Co v Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964). [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
Sullivan (University of California Press, 2023), which tells the full story of New York Times v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:44 am
Wermiel: I first came across Justice Brennan’s unpublished defense of Sullivan in Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:17 am
In Sullivan v Bristol Film Studios Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 570 (3 May 2012) the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from a strike out of a claim for copyright, moral rights and performers' rights infringement and breach of contract under CPR 3.4 by the Chancery interim applications judge sitting in Bristol. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court handed down Sullivan v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:31 am
Sullivan. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 1:41 am
Colonel Sullivan at CAAFlog had some critical remarks for the new brief by Kennedy in Kennedy v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:02 am
In Blankenship v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:27 am
Sullivan (aka Soloman) v Bristol Film Studios Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 570; [2012] WLR (D) 145 “In deciding whether a small claim ought to be struck out as an abuse of process it was relevant to consider whether there was a proportionate procedure available by which the claim could be adjudicated.” WLR Daily, 3rd May 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 9:07 am
R. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:04 am
The California Supreme Court yesterday issued its opinion in Sullivan v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 1:36 pm
Sullivan, No. 10-0383/MC, affirming NMCCA. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 9:07 am
R. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:42 pm
Sullivan (Seton Hall University - School of Law) has posted The Curious Incident of Gross and the Significance of Congress's Failure to Bark (Texas Law Review, Vol. 90 , 2012) on SSRN. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 7:28 am
Thanks to SCOTUSblog's posting of today's Supreme Court orders list, it appears that for the second straight week the the Justices have decided not to decide what to do with the cert petition in Sullivan v. [read post]
