Search for: "Supreme, L.L.C." Results 41 - 60 of 970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
II, L.L.C., when the New York County Supreme Court found Natixis wasn't in default of its lease, the landlord appealed to the Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 5:38 pm by Andrew M. Ironside
The title of this post comes from this upcoming paper by Professor Michael Morley, the abstract of which states: The four-factor test for issuing injunctions under federal laws that the Supreme Court endorsed in eBay, Inc. v MercExchange, L.L.C. requires... [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:00 am by ADR Times
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments earlier this week in Oxford Health Plans L.L.C. vs. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 9:43 pm
MercExchange, L.L.C. that the Federal Circuit's rubric that a patentee victory in a patent infringement lawsuit rendered the grant of a permanent injunction against the defendant almost "automatic," it is likely that the Supreme Court intended merely... [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:19 am by CivPro Blogger
The cases, which the Court consolidated, are Actavis Elizabeth, L.L.C. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 10:08 am by Charles Abut
      Willingboro Mall, LTD. v. 240/242 Franklin Avenue, L.L.C., ____ N.J.___(2013); New Jersey Supreme Court, August 7, 2013 [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:00 am
.; UBS Securities, L.L.C.; E*TRADE Capital Markets, L.L.C.; National Financial Services, L.L.C. had engaged in the naked short selling of Escala stock. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 11:05 am
 The Court granted leave to appeal in  Superior Hotels, L.L.C. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:46 pm by Peter Altieri
In a per curiam opinion issued yesterday in Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
Nevertheless, when it reached the Louisiana Supreme Court, it was mainly about the standards of appellate review. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 12:05 pm
., L.L.C., No. 08-453 In an action claiming that certain state fair-lending laws were preempted by the National Bank Act (NBA) and accompanying regulations, an injunction in favor of Plaintiffs is affirmed in part, where the state’s threatened issuance of executive subpoenas was an improper exercise of “supervisory power”. [...] [read post]