Search for: "Supreme Builders"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,012
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Appeals Construction Law: Builder’s/Mechanic’s/Construction LiensStuart Olson Dominion Construction Ltd. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
[UPDATE: In a lien priority dispute of importance to lenders and builders, the Minnesota Supreme Court issued an opinion today holding that "of record" means when received by the registrar, when date and time stamped and assigned a document number.] [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 10:17 am
Scalise Builders of South Carolina, the Supreme Court considered the application of the summary judgment standard in connection with the tort of outrage. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:32 am
The insured sued the builder for faulty workmanship and obtained a judgment; however, because the builder was insolvent, the insured was unable to collect on the judgment. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 8:36 am
In a recent South Carolina Supreme Court decision, the Court struck a mandatory arbitration clause from purchaser contracts with a home builder because the terms were considered to be unconscionable. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 8:36 am
In a recent South Carolina Supreme Court decision, the Court struck a mandatory arbitration clause from purchaser contracts with a home builder because the terms were considered to be unconscionable. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 5:31 pm
National Association of Home Builders v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:44 am
Wesselhoff, Licensed Builders Shed Consumer Protection Claims [reporting on the Michigan Supreme Court's decision in Liss v Lewiston-Richards] Leslee M. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:01 am
Last week the Oregon Supreme Court held that a homeowner seeking to recover against a builder for damages caused by construction defects may sue for common law negligence, absent a contractual provision that forecloses such a claim. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 12:18 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in National Association of Home Builders v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:05 pm
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an industry group composed of the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), and National Association of REALTORS® (NAR) has filed a brief as amici curiae cautioning the Supreme Court against a ruling that could call into question all of the CFPB’s regulations.... [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
"Builder's PAC aided judge; Justice says help needed for his legal bills even as firm's appeal neared": The Dallas Morning News today contains an article that begins, "A political committee funded by homebuilder Bob Perry contributed $16,000 to help Supreme Court Justice Nathan Hecht pay his legal bills as the court was preparing to hear arguments in a case against the company. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:33 pm
Slate Magazine: Justice Brennan Can't Be Reincarnated, by Seth Stern: Liberals can dream, but a consensus-builder has little to work with on today's Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 10:06 pm
The Supreme Court released another major environmental decision Monday, National Association of Home Builders v. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 1:01 pm
Yesterday the Supreme Court granted cert in another significant environmental law case — actually two combined cases, National Association of Home Builders v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 10:52 pm
My Latest Blog: Condominium Homeowners' Associations have just been given the Go-Ahead by the Nevada Supreme Court to Sue Builders for Construction Defects using Class-Action Status: http://ping.fm/WK6AD [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
No. 10–1278 FLYNN BUILDERS, L.C. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:19 am
Century Builders, the South Carolina Supreme Court continued a line of cases holding that the "restrictions in a non-compete clause cannot be rewritten by a court or limited by the parties' agreement, but must stand or fall on their own terms. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:09 pm
On October 16, 2013, 60 days after the request was submitted, the California Supreme Court denied Infill Builders’ request to depublish Citizens for Ceres v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 5:05 am
Haynes Waters Builders, the state supreme court revisited the admission of expert testimony. [read post]
